assisgnment #10

    I think peer review is somewhat effective. Having your peers telling you how they would write is something peer review does great. As a peer reviewer, my strengths would probably have to be that I tell it how it is. I would tell them how I would write it. I think we do have the appropriate amount of time for peer review. A whole week is good enough. It is helpful to do the peer review for earlier stages of the writing process. And to answer the question whether small groups or large groups are better, well we've only done this in small groups, so I don't know how it would it be if we do it in large groups.